From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 01 Oct 2007 05:55:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l91Ct6M3018659 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 05:55:07 -0700 Message-ID: <4700EE2A.1020304@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:55:06 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.23 - revert a commit References: <20071001072350.DF61C58C4C0A@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20071001072350.DF61C58C4C0A@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Tim Shimmin Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Tim Shimmin wrote: > Hi Linus, > > A problem has been found for the XFS commit b394e43e995d08821588a22561c6a71a63b4ff27 > and it needs to be reverted. > It has the potential for worse corruption than what it is meant to fix. Whoops... that's what I get for picking it up too soon for fedora I guess! Any background on the newly-found problem, for those of us in the peanut gallery? Thanks, -Eric