From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 01 Oct 2007 06:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l91D5WUC020140
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 06:05:34 -0700
Message-ID: <4700F09C.5080903@sandeen.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:05:32 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.23 - revert a commit
References: <20071001072350.DF61C58C4C0A@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <4700EE2A.1020304@sandeen.net>
In-Reply-To: <4700EE2A.1020304@sandeen.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com

Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Tim Shimmin wrote:
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> A problem has been found for the XFS commit b394e43e995d08821588a22561c6a71a63b4ff27
>> and it needs to be reverted.
>> It has the potential for worse corruption than what it is meant to fix.
> 
> 
> Whoops... that's what I get for picking it up too soon for fedora I guess!
> 
> Any background on the newly-found problem, for those of us in the peanut
> gallery?

Oh, I'm sorry, the problem description is already there.  I thought that
was the original commit description when I first saw it.

-Eric