From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l982mTTf013632
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:48:31 -0700
Message-ID: <47099A73.4020703@fastmail.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:48:19 +0800
From: Max Waterman <davidmaxwaterman+kernel@fastmail.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: XFS internal error
References: <470831E6.4030704@fastmail.co.uk> <20071008001452.GX995458@sgi.com> <47098DD4.4090207@fastmail.co.uk> <op.tzuxcgsi3jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.tzuxcgsi3jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Barry Naujok <bnaujok@sgi.com>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com

Barry Naujok wrote:
> Yes, the latest xfs_repair doesn't create a lost+found unless it
> needs to, and if it does so, it will list the inodes moved there.
>
> So, in your case, nothing went to lost+found.
>
> Regards,
> Barry.
Great. Thanks a lot for your help :)

Max.

PS. I'm still missing working at SGI :|