From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout3.imos.net (mailout3.imos.net [212.87.132.34]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l9TF5V80032493 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:05:33 -0700 Message-ID: <4725F6C0.3020303@theendofthetunnel.de> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:05:36 +0100 From: Hannes Dorbath MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Default mount options (that suck less). References: <20071029075657.GA84369978@melbourne.sgi.com> <4725E84D.3030609@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <4725E84D.3030609@sandeen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Niv Sardi , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 29.10.2007 15:03, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Niv Sardi wrote: >> XFS's default mount options are in most cases sub-optimal, we should try >> to have more sensible defaults, so far I'm following some quick dave-powered >> recomendations: Is there any reason to not set the default inode size to 512 bytes? ..as suggested in: http://www.suse.de/~agruen/acl/linux-acls/online/ -- Regards, Hannes Dorbath