From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:17:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mars.puhasoft.hu (mars.puhasoft.hu [212.108.197.33]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id lAU8HPdX004975 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:17:31 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mars.puhasoft.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7E94064D9 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:17:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from mars.puhasoft.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mars.puhasoft.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05638-03 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:17:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.1.0.13] (pool-2694.adsl.interware.hu [213.178.110.134]) by mars.puhasoft.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C593406F82 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:17:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <474FC712.1010809@tsabi.hu> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:17:22 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VMOzdGggQ3NhYmE=?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS performance problems on Linux x86_64 References: <474C8A05.3020604@e-626.net> <20071127220536.GL119954183@sgi.com> <20071130045808.GK119954183@sgi.com> <474FB90C.4060905@tsabi.hu> <20071130075431.GN119954183@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20071130075431.GN119954183@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Hey, David Chinner írta: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:17:32AM +0100, Tóth Csaba wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> I tried this parameters, and got this results with bonnie++. As i think >> there isnt any speedup with this parameteres, or i am doing something wrong? > > Try creating more than 16 files in your test. Maybe 160,000 instead? I believe bonnie++ has a test like that too. (i dont know anything about wehat tests bonnie++ has exactly) ok, ty for the reply. I just didnt understanded why i didnt get the same results. tsabi