From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:13:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id lBB2DJuF008176 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:13:22 -0800 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 331204687CD for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:13:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id TPazJcRCm8a9fV3E for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:13:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <475DF228.80306@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:12:56 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 References: <002a01c83b74$52060330$f6120990$@de> <475DC056.3000502@sandeen.net> <000301c83b92$191f6110$4b5e2330$@de> In-Reply-To: <000301c83b92$191f6110$4b5e2330$@de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Chris Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Chris wrote: > I just tested some more and using parted found out the following: > > (parted) print > Warning: /dev/sdb contains GPT signatures, indicating that is has a GPT > table. However, it does not have a valid fake msdos partition table, as it > should. Perhaps it was corrupted -- possibly by a program that doesn't > understand GPT partition tables. Or perhaps you deleted the GPT table, and > are now using an msdos partition table. Is this a GPT partition table? > Yes/No? y > > Disk /dev/sdb: 3001GB > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B > Partition Table: gpt > > Number Start End Size File system Name > Flags > 1 17.4kB 22250GB 22250GB xfs > > > So it seems that parted can still "see" the old table. But it doesn't have > support for resizing xfs partitions... So, did you originally have a gpt or an msdos partition table?