From: "David Sparks" <dave@ca.sophos.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: mkfs.xfs ... lazy-count=1 ... not mountable by older kernels?
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:42:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <475EE83A.3060607@ca.sophos.com> (raw)
Hi all,
Is it expected that filesystems made with lazy-count=1 are not mountable by
older kernels?
I'm installing a system based with install media based on 2.6.19 and mkfs.xfs
2.8.11 (its Gentoo 2007.0). That mkfs.xfs is old so i copied over a 2.9.4
binary and used that to mkfs the filesystem but its unmountable. Removing the
lazy-count=1 option makes it mountable.
Is this an expected incompatibility or is mix-n-matching xfsprogs a bad idea?
Thanks!
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-11 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-11 19:42 David Sparks [this message]
2007-12-11 22:15 ` mkfs.xfs ... lazy-count=1 ... not mountable by older kernels? David Chinner
2007-12-12 0:37 ` Timothy Shimmin
2007-12-12 13:19 ` Justin Piszcz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=475EE83A.3060607@ca.sophos.com \
--to=dave@ca.sophos.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox