From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:08:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m0HK8hdj030752 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:08:45 -0800 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4FEA052F78B for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:08:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 3g2F8CnzT8jUPaiT for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:08:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <478FA832.7030200@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:10:42 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command? References: <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F0253594C@pvn-3001.purevideo.local> <20080117030111.GH155259@sgi.com> <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F02535951@pvn-3001.purevideo.local> In-Reply-To: <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F02535951@pvn-3001.purevideo.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Mark Magpayo Cc: David Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com Mark Magpayo wrote: > Someone else asked for the size of the block devices... here's the > output from /proc/partitions: > > 152 0 9523468862 etherd/e1.0 > 152 16 9523468862 etherd/e0.0 are those two assembled into your actual block device? They look each about 8T. Is the lvm device also in /proc/partitions? -Eric