From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:19:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m0HMJlQs020061 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:19:48 -0800 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E6AD85306CA for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:20:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id v9BVXo89fWwVol9k for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:20:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <478FD48F.1060707@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:19:59 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command? References: <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F02535951@pvn-3001.purevideo.local> <478FA832.7030200@sandeen.net> <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F02535954@pvn-3001.purevideo.local> In-Reply-To: <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F02535954@pvn-3001.purevideo.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Mark Magpayo Cc: David Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com Mark Magpayo wrote: > Here's the entire output: > > major minor #blocks name > > 3 0 512000 hda > 3 1 511528 hda1 > 152 0 9523468862 etherd/e1.0 > 152 16 9523468862 etherd/e0.0 > 254 0 19046932480 dm-0 > > > I believe dm-0 is the lvm device. Yep, in 1k units, so: 19046932480*1024 19504058859520 and: superblock read failed, offset 19504058859520, size 2048, ag 64, rval 0 so it's trying to read a 2k (?) superblock right in the last 1k of the device? Hrm. (Dave, Barry - isn't that 2048 the sector size, not block size?) Also from your sb 0 printout: blocksize = 4096 dblocks = 11904332800 is 48760147148800, exactly 2.5x bigger than your device is. Weird. -Eric