From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:34:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m0IIYFKs009471 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:34:19 -0800 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id AB268C8EF82 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:34:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id CAoe1MxY9DZhN7GP for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:34:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4790F137.7000700@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:34:31 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command? References: <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F0253595A@pvn-3001.purevideo.local> <20080117234604.GG155407@sgi.com> <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F0253595B@pvn-3001.purevideo.local> In-Reply-To: <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F0253595B@pvn-3001.purevideo.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Mark Magpayo Cc: David Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com Mark Magpayo wrote: >>> So is this all I need then prior to an xfs_repair?: >>> >>>> # for i in `seq 0 1 63`; do >>>>> xfs_db -x -c "sb $i" -c 'write agcount 64' -c 'write dblock >> 4761733120' >>>> /dev/vg0/lv0 >> Yes, I think that is all that is necessary (that+repair was what fixed >> the problem at the customer site successfully). >> > > Is this supposed to be the proper output to the command above? > > purenas:~# for i in `seq 0 1 63`; do xfs_db -x -c "sb $i" -c 'write > agcount 64' -c 'write dblock 4761733120' /dev/vg0/lv0; done > agcount = 64 > field dblock not found ... I think dave had a typo, should be dblocks with an "s" on the end. Feel free to wait for his confirmation, though, since this is surgery, after all :) -eric