From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:46:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m0L3kQCS001928 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:46:28 -0800 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 5D6A9CAAF8E for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:46:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id aZfDu9uos8T83coI for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:46:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4794159F.9070505@sandeen.net> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:46:39 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: small problem w/ new xfs defaults patch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: xfs-oss , Niv Sardi Index: xfsprogs-2.9.4/growfs/xfs_growfs.c =================================================================== --- xfsprogs-2.9.4.orig/growfs/xfs_growfs.c +++ xfsprogs-2.9.4/growfs/xfs_growfs.c @@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ report_info( int isint, char *logname, char *rtname, - int unwritten, int lazycount, int dirversion, int logversion, @@ -68,7 +67,7 @@ report_info( "meta-data=%-22s isize=%-6u agcount=%u, agsize=%u blks\n" " =%-22s sectsz=%-5u attr=%u\n" "data =%-22s bsize=%-6u blocks=%llu, imaxpct=%u\n" - " =%-22s sunit=%-6u swidth=%u blks, unwritten=%u\n" + " =%-22s sunit=%-6u swidth=%u blks" "naming =version %-14u bsize=%-6u\n" "log =%-22s bsize=%-6u blocks=%u, version=%u\n" " =%-22s sectsz=%-5u sunit=%u blks, lazy-count=%u\n" couple things... you lost a "\n" off the end of the data section there... Also, do you really want to drop reporting of unwritten extents? Even if you're disallowing the selection on new mkfs's there may still be different flavors of filesystems in existence, should it still be reported? -Eric