From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:29:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m0L5T9hW016944 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:29:12 -0800 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 2973A53EB71 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:29:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 8kprRHVRjr8y8MgY for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:29:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47942DB5.6040708@sandeen.net> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:29:25 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: small problem w/ new xfs defaults patch References: <4794159F.9070505@sandeen.net> <20080121051341.GA31708862@melbourne.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080121051341.GA31708862@melbourne.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Niv Sardi Cc: xfs-oss Niv Sardi wrote: > * Eric Sandeen [2008-01-20 21:46:39 -0600]: > >> Index: xfsprogs-2.9.4/growfs/xfs_growfs.c >> =================================================================== > [...] >> couple things... you lost a "\n" off the end of the data section there... > > That has been fixed, I guess it needs to be sent to oss (barry?) Ok, see that. Sorry... grabbed the original patch and didn't check cvs for updates. Thanks, -Eric >> Also, do you really want to drop reporting of unwritten extents? Even >> if you're disallowing the selection on new mkfs's there may still be >> different flavors of filesystems in existence, should it still be reported? > > I don't really care, whatever the oss/xfs-master people like best. > > Cheers