From: Mark Goodwin <markgw@sgi.com>
To: Mark Magpayo <mmagpayo@purevideo.com>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command?
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:48:18 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <479672B2.9070103@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F0253596F@pvn-3001.purevideo.local>
Mark Magpayo wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com [mailto:xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com] On Behalf
> Of
>> David Chinner
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:13 PM
>> To: Mark Magpayo
>> Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
>> Subject: Re: Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command?
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 11:40:52AM -0800, Mark Magpayo wrote:
>>> Any ideas on how long the xfs_repair is supposed to take on 18TB? I
>>> started it Friday nite, and it's now Tuesday afternoon. It's stuck
>>> here:
>>>
>>> Phase 5 - rebuild AG headers and trees...
>>> - reset superblock...
>>> Phase 6 - check inode connectivity...
>>> - resetting contents of realtime bitmap and summary inodes
>>> - traversing filesystem ...
>>>
>>> I figure traversing a filesystem of 18TB takes a while, but does 4
> days
>>> sound right?
>> Yes, it can if it's swapping like mad because you don't have enough
>> RAM in the machine. Runtime is also detemrined by how many inodes
> there
>> are in the filesystem - do you know how many there are? Also, more
>> recent xfs_repair versions tend to be faster - what version are you
>> using again?
>
> Using version 2.9.4. I may have forgotten to allocate more swap space
> (as was told in the manual given to me by the vendor), so would breaking
> out of the repair and restarting with more swap help out, or am I too
> deep (4 days) into it and should just let it run?
cat /proc/meminfo for this machine and post it here. If it's swapping,
adding more swap wont speed it up. If it runs out of swap the repair
will stop anyway ;-)
Cheers
--
Mark Goodwin markgw@sgi.com
Engineering Manager for XFS and PCP Phone: +61-3-99631937
SGI Australian Software Group Cell: +61-4-18969583
-------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-22 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-16 23:19 Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command? Mark Magpayo
2008-01-17 2:31 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-01-17 3:01 ` David Chinner
2008-01-17 17:29 ` Mark Magpayo
2008-01-17 19:10 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-01-17 20:04 ` Mark Magpayo
2008-01-17 22:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-01-17 22:47 ` Nathan Scott
2008-01-17 23:15 ` David Chinner
2008-01-17 23:29 ` Mark Magpayo
2008-01-17 23:46 ` David Chinner
2008-01-18 17:50 ` Mark Magpayo
2008-01-18 18:34 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-01-19 0:40 ` David Chinner
2008-01-22 19:40 ` Mark Magpayo
2008-01-22 21:13 ` David Chinner
2008-01-22 21:46 ` Mark Magpayo
2008-01-22 22:48 ` Mark Goodwin [this message]
2008-01-22 22:50 ` Mark Magpayo
2008-01-23 2:57 ` Barry Naujok
2008-01-23 17:24 ` Mark Magpayo
2008-01-24 1:02 ` Barry Naujok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=479672B2.9070103@sgi.com \
--to=markgw@sgi.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=mmagpayo@purevideo.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox