From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:22:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m0V3MBWW027409 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:22:15 -0800 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 22420D56FCA for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:17:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id HkkAJyDlwGg9FRmo for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:17:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47A13DD1.1010908@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:17:37 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: mkfs.xfs doesn't detect size of storage correctly References: <20080129093201.GA16203@citd.de> <20080129171658.GB21228@citd.de> <20080130232628.GA9671@citd.de> In-Reply-To: <20080130232628.GA9671@citd.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Matthias Schniedermeyer Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > A little followup. > > Today i bought another 750GB HDD, and a 500GB. > > Initializing the encryption of the 500GB finished a minute ago and the > same bug, of course with a different size (357702MB), was observable. > > Workaround also worked in this case (Now its 476937MB). This also proves > that the bug is of recent nature, the last 500GB HDD i bought was just > over a month ago and this bug didn't show up then. Yes, it's a regression in 2.9.5. http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-cmds/xfsprogs/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c.diff?r1=1.82;r2=1.83 -Eric