From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:53:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m15ErQlw000954 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:53:30 -0800 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 5F5F45A0434 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:53:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kyCndqo2GARFkWUS for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:53:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47A87877.1050106@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:53:43 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: mkfs.xfs doesn't detect size of storage correctly References: <20080129093201.GA16203@citd.de> In-Reply-To: <20080129093201.GA16203@citd.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Matthias Schniedermeyer Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > There is roughly 1/3 missing. SGI, have you settled on a fix for this? Latest released xfsprogs, 2.9.5 has this problem, and I've put it in rawhide; it's also in the F9 alpha spin. Should I revert to 2.9.4 if you don't have plans to fix it soon? Nothing indicates to the user that their fs was misformatted, and there will be a growing number fileystems missing a substantial portion of their space out there.... -Eric