From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:13:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id m15LDGVJ027751 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:13:20 -0800 Message-ID: <47A8D156.8060405@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:12:54 +1100 From: Mark Goodwin Reply-To: markgw@sgi.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: mkfs.xfs doesn't detect size of storage correctly References: <20080129093201.GA16203@citd.de> <47A87877.1050106@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <47A87877.1050106@sandeen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Matthias Schniedermeyer , xfs@oss.sgi.com Eric Sandeen wrote: > Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > >> There is roughly 1/3 missing. > > SGI, have you settled on a fix for this? Yes, Barry is reviewing and testing your proposed fix. The delay was caused by most of the XFS team attending LCA last week. .. sorry. We'll get a new package out onto OSS asap. Cheers -- Mark > Latest released xfsprogs, > 2.9.5 has this problem, and I've put it in rawhide; it's also in the F9 > alpha spin. Should I revert to 2.9.4 if you don't have plans to fix it > soon? > > Nothing indicates to the user that their fs was misformatted, and there > will be a growing number fileystems missing a substantial portion of > their space out there.... > > -Eric > >