* %inodes question
@ 2008-02-06 1:15 Linda A. Walsh
2008-02-06 3:20 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Linda A. Walsh @ 2008-02-06 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs-oss
Does this really matter much anymore? It defaults to 25%, but
on a 1T disk, that's 250G "reserved"(?) for inodes? Even 1%
still gives you 10G of inodes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: %inodes question
2008-02-06 1:15 %inodes question Linda A. Walsh
@ 2008-02-06 3:20 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2008-02-06 3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linda A. Walsh; +Cc: xfs-oss
Linda A. Walsh wrote:
> Does this really matter much anymore? It defaults to 25%, but
> on a 1T disk, that's 250G "reserved"(?) for inodes? Even 1%
> still gives you 10G of inodes.
Not any more. xfsprogs 2.9.5 will put it at 5% for a 1T fs.
And it's not reserved per se; it's just the maximum. Inodes are
allocated dynamically up to that point.
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-06 3:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-06 1:15 %inodes question Linda A. Walsh
2008-02-06 3:20 ` Eric Sandeen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox