From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:36:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m1G4a58r031328
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:36:07 -0800
Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 55AC45E21FC
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:36:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id yC6SacGR2QiEfnBc for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:36:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <47B6684D.4060502@sandeen.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:36:29 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output.
References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802160149590.4592@alienAngel.home.sk> <47B66223.4080604@sandeen.net> <47B6679C.2040109@sandeen.net>
In-Reply-To: <47B6679C.2040109@sandeen.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Jan Derfinak <ja@mail.upjs.sk>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com

Eric Sandeen wrote:

> Hmm and I don't know how lazy-sb-count is getting lost, yet :)

oh same reason of course.  it's just that on my mkfs lazy-count isn't
default...

-Eric