From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:03:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m1PH3K7n002189 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:03:21 -0800 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 73ECFEB8E82 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:03:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id wfiYHLb3wrjaYtA6 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:03:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47C2F4EF.4020008@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:03:43 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS on Red Hat EL5 References: <00fa01c874b5$1908d150$8e0010ac@sg.lcl> <47BDD390.1040102@sandeen.net> <000601c877c5$d33297b0$8e0010ac@sg.lcl> In-Reply-To: <000601c877c5$d33297b0$8e0010ac@sg.lcl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Miakell Figueredo Cc: 'Justin Piszcz' , xfs@oss.sgi.com Miakell Figueredo wrote: > Hi Eric: > > > > I'm getting the following when rebuilding > "kernel-module-xfs-2.6.17-1.2519.4.21.el5-0.2-1.src.rpm": (Any Ideas?) > how did you invoke the build, and did you have a matching kernel and kernel-devel rpm installed? -Eric > > + STATUS=0 > > + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' > > + cd xfs > > ++ /usr/bin/id -u > > + '[' 0 = 0 ']' > > + /bin/chown -Rhf root . > > ++ /usr/bin/id -u > > + '[' 0 = 0 ']' > > + /bin/chgrp -Rhf root . > > + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . > > + echo 'Patch #0 (xfs-ootbuild.patch):' > > Patch #0 (xfs-ootbuild.patch): > > + patch -p1 -s > > + echo 'Patch #1 (xfs-kernel-has-roundup.patch):' > > Patch #1 (xfs-kernel-has-roundup.patch): > > + patch -p1 -s > > + echo 'Patch #2 (xfs-fix-mrinit.patch):' > > Patch #2 (xfs-fix-mrinit.patch): > > + patch -p1 -s > > + echo 'Patch #3 (xfs-vfs-interface-fixes.patch):' > > Patch #3 (xfs-vfs-interface-fixes.patch): > > + patch -p1 -s > > + echo 'Patch #4 (xfs-no-i_blksize.patch):' > > Patch #4 (xfs-no-i_blksize.patch): > > + patch -p1 -s > > + echo 'Patch #5 (xfs-fail_migrate_page-header.patch):' > > Patch #5 (xfs-fail_migrate_page-header.patch): > > + patch -p1 -s > > + cp /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/config.xfs . > > + exit 0 > > Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.15200 > > + umask 022 > > + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD > > + cd xfs > > + LANG=C > > + export LANG > > + unset DISPLAY > > + make 'TOPDIR=%{kernel_topdir}' modules > > make -C %{kernel_topdir} OOT_BUILD=y SUBDIRS=/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/xfs > modules > > make: *** %{kernel_topdir}: No such file or directory. Stop. > > make: *** [modules] Error 2 > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.15200 (%build) > > > > > > RPM build errors: > > user sandeen does not exist - using root > > group sandeen does not exist - using root > > user sandeen does not exist - using root > > group sandeen does not exist - using root > > user sandeen does not exist - using root > > group sandeen does not exist - using root > > user sandeen does not exist - using root > > group sandeen does not exist - using root > > user sandeen does not exist - using root > > group sandeen does not exist - using root > > user sandeen does not exist - using root > > group sandeen does not exist - using root > > user sandeen does not exist - using root > > group sandeen does not exist - using root > > user sandeen does not exist - using root > > group sandeen does not exist - using root > > user sandeen does not exist - using root > > group sandeen does not exist - using root > > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.15200 (%build) > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Sandeen [mailto:sandeen@sandeen.net] > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 2:40 PM > To: Justin Piszcz > Cc: Miakell Figueredo; xfs@oss.sgi.com > Subject: Re: XFS on Red Hat EL5 > > > > Justin Piszcz wrote: > >> Eric makes some RPMs for them.. > > > > Yep, take a look at http://sandeen.net/rhel5_xfs > > > > They're a bit outdated at this point, though I'm not aware of any > > significant bugs. > > > > Or, the centos distro has similar (if not the same) rpms. > > > > RHEL does not support xfs, so using xfs may change whatever support > > agreements you have in place. > > > > -Eric (speaking only for himself) > > > >> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Miakell Figueredo wrote: > >> > >>> Hello: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Is there an RPM for XFS on Red Hat? Currently we are running > >>> "2.6.18-53.1.13.el5xen #1 SMP Mon Feb 11 13:41:50 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 > >>> x86_64 GNU/Linux" and installed "xfsprogs.i386-2.9.5-1.fc9" and I cannot > >>> mount the volume. > > >