From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:57:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m1SLv9T7025325 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:57:10 -0800 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 87DBD62B895 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:57:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id x97xHvCEcYCHxKJt for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:57:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47C72E50.90005@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:57:36 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] kill t_sema member of struct xfs_trans References: <20080207082724.GA14119@lst.de> <20080226175758.GA13162@lst.de> <20080227005546.GA77525841@sgi.com> <47C50CC0.1080802@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <47C50CC0.1080802@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Timothy Shimmin Cc: Niv Sardi , Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com Timothy Shimmin wrote: > Niv, it still seems to be in our dev tree for me: And if it were checked in, where's the TAKE message? :) -Eric