From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@thebarn.com>
Cc: nscott@aconex.com, Barry Naujok <bnaujok@sgi.com>,
"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:11:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C89137.3070805@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47C87775.2010007@thebarn.com>
Russell Cattelan wrote:
>> Hmm, that still seems pretty soon to me. I'd have thought you'd at
>> least want to wait until most of the distributions (esp. SUSE for you
>> guys) have released versions that have kernels sufficiently recent
>> that the default mkfs will work. Otherwise this will be a recurring
>> problem.
>>
> I don't suppose there is an easy way to query xfs and find out if it can
> support
> the lazy SB option?
I thought about that; xfs *could* stick someting in /proc/fs/xfs with
supported features or somesuch.
But, the kernel you mkfs under isn't necessarily the one you're going to
need to fall back to tomorrow, though...
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-29 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-28 1:09 [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs Barry Naujok
2008-02-28 2:35 ` Nathan Scott
2008-02-29 21:21 ` Russell Cattelan
2008-02-29 23:11 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2008-02-29 23:19 ` Russell Cattelan
2008-02-29 23:47 ` Mark Goodwin
2008-02-29 23:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-03-01 0:11 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-03-02 23:59 ` Barry Naujok
2008-03-01 0:02 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2008-03-02 23:34 ` Nathan Scott
2008-03-03 0:16 ` Timothy Shimmin
2008-03-03 0:30 ` Mark Goodwin
2008-03-03 1:15 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2008-03-03 3:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-03-03 4:14 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2008-03-03 4:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-03-03 4:47 ` Niv Sardi
2008-03-03 0:18 ` Donald Douwsma
2008-03-03 0:24 ` Nathan Scott
2008-03-02 10:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-02 10:41 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47C89137.3070805@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=bnaujok@sgi.com \
--cc=cattelan@thebarn.com \
--cc=nscott@aconex.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox