From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:10:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m210AZBM004771 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:10:38 -0800 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 61126634DD8 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:11:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id v69GJDsffuy30UwK for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:11:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47C89F17.7040307@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:11:03 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs References: <1204166101.13569.102.camel@edge.scott.net.au> <47C87775.2010007@thebarn.com> <47C89137.3070805@sandeen.net> <47C89303.7070902@thebarn.com> <47C8997A.9030804@sgi.com> <47C89B94.4060002@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <47C89B94.4060002@sandeen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: markgw@sgi.com Cc: Russell Cattelan , nscott@aconex.com, Barry Naujok , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" Eric Sandeen wrote: > maybe just 2 values, with the actual supported features (& features2) > values anded together? Easy enough to parse in the code. > > i.e. > > # cat /proc/fs/xfs/features > 0xffffffff > 0x00000001 hm, but of course mkfs should never be checking for anything in the first features slot; yesterday's kernels support all those flags but don't export anything. wow, this is starting to feel as complex as ext4's flags ;) -Eric