From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:18:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id m234Hmux003913 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 20:17:50 -0800 Message-ID: <47CB7D52.2030704@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:23:46 +1100 From: Lachlan McIlroy Reply-To: lachlan@sgi.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: filesystem corruption in linus tree References: <03F8FD43-322F-41E3-A7A0-CD4E9AD8B4DE@ap.physik.uni-giessen.de> <200802252347.50576.marc.dietrich@ap.physik.uni-giessen.de> <47C3C20A.90603@sgi.com> <200802262100.18631.marc.dietrich@ap.physik.uni-giessen.de> In-Reply-To: <200802262100.18631.marc.dietrich@ap.physik.uni-giessen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Marc Dietrich Cc: Barry Naujok , xfs@oss.sgi.com Marc Dietrich wrote: > Hi again, > > On Tuesday 26 February 2008 08:38:50 Lachlan McIlroy wrote: >> Marc Dietrich wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Monday 25 February 2008 01:36:28 Barry Naujok wrote: >>>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:58:26 +1100, Marc Dietrich >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> somewhere after the release of 2.6.24 my xfs filesystem got corrupted. >>>>> Initialy I thought it was only related to the readdir bug. >>>>> (http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-02/msg00027.html) So I waited for >>>>> the fix to go into mainline. Yesterday I tried again, but got this >>>>> error during boot: > > > >> We've had a few problems reported with XFS on 32-bit powermacs and the >> culprit appears to be some changes to bit manipulation routines. Could you >> please try reverse applying the attached patches and see if the problem is >> resolved? > > I saw, that you already pushed it into mainline - for a good reason ;-) Works > as expeted. > > Please also don't forget 2.6.24-stable ! The changes that caused this regression went into 2.6.25-rc1 so no need for a 2.6.24 stable fix.