From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:52:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m253qdam014414 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 19:52:40 -0800 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 63821652FA2 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 19:53:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id KUyUB1mFC4DTOQNg for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:53:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47CE1921.9000708@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:53:05 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: corruption in xfs_end_bio_unwritten References: <629727.55106.qm@web32504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <47CDCA12.5060107@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <47CDCA12.5060107@sandeen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Ravi Wijayaratne Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Eric Sandeen wrote: > Ravi Wijayaratne wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am seeing data corruption in xfs_end_bio_unwritten. Possibly the corruption is happening before. >> Here is what I see. > > what kernel, for starters? 2.6.16 + XFS from SLES10 I hear... :) So for starters, I'd bug SuSE.... otherwise I'd see if it persists upstream. Is AIO+DIO in the mix? perhaps it is related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217098 -Eric