From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:59:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m284xNpm032515 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 20:59:24 -0800 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 29387F43065 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 20:59:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id xpV53WOlS2c7ZmB2 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:59:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47D21D2A.90902@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:59:22 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] - remove mounpoint UUID code References: <47D20F78.7000103@sandeen.net> <47D216A3.9040406@sgi.com> <47D2171D.7070202@sandeen.net> <47D218CF.8090909@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <47D218CF.8090909@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: ianc@melbourne.sgi.com Cc: xfs-oss Ian Costello wrote: > Eric, > > My bad, cxfs uses the sb_uuid, should have looked a little closer at the > patch. I assumed the worst from the heading (must have filtered the > "point" out of the heading :) Nah, I wouldn't do that to you ;) (and you wouldn't have to accept it if I did try!) :) -Eric