From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m2JBLD5G007442 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:21:17 -0700 Received: from ventoso.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 1CD94FCEDCF for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:21:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ventoso.org (61.pool85-52-226.static.orange.es [85.52.226.61]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id gBfyvZw4eDvzt5OQ for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:21:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ventoso.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB30C1FA28 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:21:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47E0F746.1090508@ventoso.org> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:21:42 +0100 From: Luca Olivetti MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix dir2 shortform structures on ARM old ABI References: <20080319002307.GA11349@josefsipek.net> In-Reply-To: <20080319002307.GA11349@josefsipek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: xfs@oss.sgi.com En/na Josef 'Jeff' Sipek ha escrit: > Thanks for the heads up wrt ARM EABI. Well, I have a linkstation lspro, even if it's running now "freelink" (i.e. debian, oabi, for the linkstation http://buffalo.nas-central.org/index.php/FreeLink), it's using the stock, eabi[*], kernel (Linux lspro 2.6.12.6-arm1 #2 Mon Jul 23 22:35:39 CEST 2007 armv5tejl GNU/Linux) and xfs works just fine. [*] though I think, but I'm not sure, it was not the real thing but something that marvell patched in. However, any later kernel I tried "breaks" xfs (that's why I originally subscribed to this list), i.e. I cannot see the contents of some directories (more details here: http://buffalo.nas-central.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=35061#p35061) The strange thing is that I can mount the failing image on i386, so it probably has the correct structures on disk. Maybe looking at what marvell/buffalo patched in that kernel could give some insight on the xfs issues with arm. Bye -- Luca