From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:13:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m3BGDMdK021380 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:13:23 -0700 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0307D781813 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id xNwOxXke3xNBJ0Dc for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47FF8E2A.30900@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:13:30 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] remove CONFIG_XFS_SECURITY References: <47819E47.4030906@sandeen.net> <47BB7774.5080401@sandeen.net> <47F985BA.7060100@sgi.com> <47FF781D.2020006@sandeen.net> <20080411160448.GA26929@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20080411160448.GA26929@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Timothy Shimmin , xfs-oss Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> +#define XFS_SECURITY_STRING "security attributes, " > > This one should just be killed completely, as it's not an optional > feature anymore. > My only concern is that if people are used to seeing it, they'll assume that somehow xfs now doesn't support it now, or was built without it, or ... *shrug* -Eric