From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Michael Darling <darlingm@gmail.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS drops create/delete files to 6.6% of EXT3 (software raid) and to 0.6% of EXT3 (3ware hardware raid)
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:18:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4810C0D3.1070107@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c33e4330804231848n72ce683cqd48a8d45937f302@mail.gmail.com>
Michael Darling wrote:
> I am preparing a new server, and benchmarking EXT3 against XFS, both using
> software RAID and hardware RAID using a 3ware 9650SE-4LPML.
>
> Using bonnie++ as a benchmark, I am seeing significant performance boosts in
> my block sequential reads and writes moving from EXT3 to XFS. I am aware
> that XFS won't create and delete files as quickly as EXT3, however I am
> seeing drops from 29455/second to 1957/second using software RAID, and from
> 32524/second to 189/second using hardware RAID. I'm not sure if when using
> software raid, if creating and deleting files should drop to 6.6% of EXT3.
> But, what I'm pretty sure of, is when using hardware raid, that creating and
> deleting files shouldn't drop to 0.6% of EXT3.
Chris Mason reminded me that bonnie++ may not be creating enough files
to actually cause much if any IO on ext3; you might play with the -n
option to get it to the point where it's actually doing a significant
number of creates (I don't know what the default is offhand... checks
source... it's 16k maybe?) but more sustained creation might be interesting.
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-24 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-24 1:48 XFS drops create/delete files to 6.6% of EXT3 (software raid) and to 0.6% of EXT3 (3ware hardware raid) Michael Darling
2008-04-24 4:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-04-24 5:33 ` David Chinner
2008-04-24 6:23 ` Michael Darling
2008-04-24 6:31 ` David Chinner
2008-04-24 15:39 ` Michael Darling
2008-04-24 12:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-04-24 14:20 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-04-24 14:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-04-24 17:18 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2008-04-25 14:54 ` Michael Darling
2008-04-26 15:23 ` Emmanuel Florac
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4810C0D3.1070107@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=darlingm@gmail.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox