From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:59:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m3SMxO9U014712 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:59:27 -0700 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 9D7A210D0062 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id fgDNpnBvBwR1hzaz for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <481656F6.5030300@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:00:06 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Problems with xfs_grow on large LVM + XFS filesystem 20TB size check 2 failed References: <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F36FD@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL> <481650F5.40205@sandeen.net> <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F3718@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL> In-Reply-To: <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F3718@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Lance Reed Cc: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" Lance Reed wrote: > Thanks for the quick response. > > Actually, I was able to run an xfs_repair and all was well.(took 45 minutes...) > > But I would love to be able to expand the XFS file system out to the max. > > I guess I could expand it in < 2TB increments then maybe? > > Thanks for the update and I will look around. > > I did find this which I think is related. > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00097.html Yep, I think expanding it in, say, 1T increments should be fine, and it should all (I think...) end up the same as if you'd done it all at once (modulo the bug, of course...) -Eric