From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m3TGseGO028894 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:55:24 -0700 Message-ID: <481752F9.8040600@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:55:21 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Problems with xfs_grow on large LVM + XFS filesystem 20TB size check 2 failed References: <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F36FD@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL> <481650F5.40205@sandeen.net> <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F3718@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL> <481656F6.5030300@sandeen.net> <48166E18.10008@sgi.com> <48166F42.50104@sandeen.net> <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F384B@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL> <48175046.5050405@sandeen.net> <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F3870@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL> In-Reply-To: <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F3870@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Lance Reed Cc: "markgw@sgi.com" , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" Lance Reed wrote: > Thanks, > > Sorry, I am a bit confused on the "data section" vs. the "real-time section"? > > Is it enough to just run "xfs_growfs -D XXX /mntpoint" and the rest should fall into place. > > Again, sorry for being dense. > I really appraciate the rapid feedback. > Unless you specifically made a filesystem with a realtime subvol, just ignore it, it's not created by default. So yes, -D (in blocks) is what you want. A little cumbersome but not too bad :) -Eric