From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 01 May 2008 00:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id m417Ku1G010798
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 1 May 2008 00:21:00 -0700
Message-ID: <48196FB6.9040503@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 17:22:30 +1000
From: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Reply-To: lachlan@sgi.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix non-debug build for xfsidbg.c
References: <20080430065937.GC108924158@sgi.com> <48181D04.4030902@sgi.com> <20080501004925.GU108924158@sgi.com> <48191FE8.9080607@sgi.com> <20080501030149.GC108924158@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080501030149.GC108924158@sgi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs-dev <xfs-dev@sgi.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

Agree.

David Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 11:42:00AM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
>> Sorry I should have been clearer.  What I actually meant was something
>> like this:
> 
> Whatever. It's not worth arguing about. I just want to get it fixed.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.