From: Greg Banks <gnb@melbourne.sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Niv Sardi <xaiki@sgi.com>, xfs-dev@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com, gnb@sgi.com
Subject: Re: Don't use d_alloc_anon for open_by_handle
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 13:51:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <481F7334.8000408@melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080505184424.GA25933@infradead.org>
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 05:53:16AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
>> It shouldn't be slow. You'd do the equivalent no_subtree check export
>> without parent fh, so what we do is call the fh_to_dentry method
>> and then call find_acceptable_alias to check if there's already an
>> dentry around and if yes use that one. That latter part is what should
>> fix your problem. If you want to be lazy you could just copy
>> find_acceptable_alias into the xfs code and call it directly and let me
>> clean up the mess later..
>>
>
> Sorry, this was written before my cup of tea in the morning.
> find_acceptable_alias is of course a no-op in the no_subtree_check case,
> and thus it's identical to what we're currently doing in the handle
> code. So any problem you see here will also be seen in an nfs
> environment with no_subtree_check, which is the sensible choise
Agreed.
> and
> I think even the default these days.
I believe so. We also use that as default on our shipping NAS servers
anyway.
> So we'd better fix the lacking
> expiry in the core code.
Mmm, sounds like fun.
> Cc'ing Greg as he's been fighting this code
> quite a bit in the past.
>
>
Thanks. I'm on xfs-dev now so I've been lurking while you guys
discussed this :-)
--
Greg Banks, P.Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group.
The cake is *not* a lie.
I don't speak for SGI.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-05 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080501070244.GH108924158@sgi.com>
2008-05-02 1:55 ` Don't use d_alloc_anon for open_by_handle xaiki
2008-05-02 1:55 ` [PATCH] Don't use hashed dentries when doing open_by_handle xaiki
2008-05-02 1:55 ` [PATCH] Use xfs_d_alloc_anon for DM rdwr using handle code xaiki
2008-05-02 6:06 ` Don't use d_alloc_anon for open_by_handle Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 6:33 ` Niv Sardi
2008-05-05 9:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 18:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 20:51 ` Greg Banks [this message]
2008-05-06 1:38 ` Niv Sardi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=481F7334.8000408@melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=gnb@melbourne.sgi.com \
--cc=gnb@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xaiki@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs-dev@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox