From: Michael Nishimoto <miken@agami.com>
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: question about xfs_alloc_fix_freelist()
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 00:16:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48215740.5050501@agami.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080507053108.GV103491721@sgi.com>
David Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:21:57PM -0700, Michael Nishimoto wrote:
> > David Chinner wrote:
> > >On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 02:01:47PM -0700, Michael Nishimoto wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The following code can be found near the end of
> xfs_alloc_fix_freelist:
> > > >
> > > > if (targs.agbno == NULLAGBLOCK) {
> > > > if (flags & XFS_ALLOC_FLAG_FREEING)
> > > > break;
> > > > xfs_trans_brelse(tp, agflbp);
> > > > args->agbp = NULL;
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Don't we need to release agbp too by calling xfs_trans_brelse(tp,
> agbp)?
> > >
> > >I don't think so. AFAICT, The agbp (agf block) is linked into the
> > >transaction and by this point we may have modified the AGF (think
> > >multiple iterations of the loop to fill the free list). Given that
> > >it may be modified, we shouldn't release it here but instead allow
> > >the transaction commit/abort to do that for us at the appropriate
> > >time.
> >
> > I understood that the transaction abort code will free resources/locks
> > when passing back an error. However, by returning args->agbp = NULL,
> > aren't we telling the calling code that we have not satisfied the request
> > in the current AG?
>
> Yes.
If this happens and the calling function decides to choose another AG, is
there a possibility of using up the entire transaction log reservation?
Couldn't we end up affecting freelists in multiple AGs with the same
transaction?
>
> > I do see the part of about the AGF possibly getting modified.
> >
> > It would help to have a clear comment description of possible inputs vs.
> > expected outputs for this function. :-)
>
> Like a lot of code, not just XFS. :/\
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> Principal Engineer
> SGI Australian Software Group
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-07 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-02 21:01 question about xfs_alloc_fix_freelist() Michael Nishimoto
2008-05-04 23:50 ` David Chinner
2008-05-06 21:21 ` Michael Nishimoto
2008-05-07 5:31 ` David Chinner
2008-05-07 7:16 ` Michael Nishimoto [this message]
2008-05-07 8:44 ` David Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48215740.5050501@agami.com \
--to=miken@agami.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox