* Re: review: log_filter.patch 018,081,082 pv#981362
[not found] <48227ef3.WIWE0hYubr4nS8cD%tes@sgi.com>
@ 2008-05-12 6:41 ` David Chinner
2008-05-12 6:47 ` Timothy Shimmin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Chinner @ 2008-05-12 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tes; +Cc: xfs-dev, xfs
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 02:17:55PM +1000, tes@sgi.com wrote:
> Due to the changes for default mkfs options where we now have
> version 2 inodes, we no longer update the di_onlink field.
> To be consistent with previous output, we filter these values out.
> Also, as part of changes to the inode generation number which uses
> a random num generator, we need to filter out the gen# too.
>
> --Tim
>
> 018.op.irix | 400 +++++++++++------------
> 018.op.linux | 400 +++++++++++------------
> 018.trans_inode | 800 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 081.ugquota.trans_inode | 816 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 082.op.irix | 400 +++++++++++------------
> 082.op.linux | 400 +++++++++++------------
> 082.trans_inode | 800 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> common.log | 3
> 8 files changed, 2011 insertions(+), 2008 deletions(-)
Worth noting is that these tests all still fail on a config that
corrects a problem with the superblock features2 field on mount.
Probably not worth bothering about - but I thought I'd mention it
as updating the tests didn't fix the failure on my machine. Updating
xfsprogs now....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: review: log_filter.patch 018,081,082 pv#981362
2008-05-12 6:41 ` review: log_filter.patch 018,081,082 pv#981362 David Chinner
@ 2008-05-12 6:47 ` Timothy Shimmin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Timothy Shimmin @ 2008-05-12 6:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Chinner; +Cc: xfs-dev, xfs
David Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 02:17:55PM +1000, tes@sgi.com wrote:
>> Due to the changes for default mkfs options where we now have
>> version 2 inodes, we no longer update the di_onlink field.
>> To be consistent with previous output, we filter these values out.
>> Also, as part of changes to the inode generation number which uses
>> a random num generator, we need to filter out the gen# too.
>>
>> --Tim
>>
>> 018.op.irix | 400 +++++++++++------------
>> 018.op.linux | 400 +++++++++++------------
>> 018.trans_inode | 800 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>> 081.ugquota.trans_inode | 816 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>> 082.op.irix | 400 +++++++++++------------
>> 082.op.linux | 400 +++++++++++------------
>> 082.trans_inode | 800 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>> common.log | 3
>> 8 files changed, 2011 insertions(+), 2008 deletions(-)
>
> Worth noting is that these tests all still fail on a config that
> corrects a problem with the superblock features2 field on mount.
>
> Probably not worth bothering about - but I thought I'd mention it
> as updating the tests didn't fix the failure on my machine. Updating
> xfsprogs now....
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
:-)
Yeah, I had the same failure until I updated mkfs.
I had an extra SB_UNIT sb buffer transaction at the start of
the log for the features2 correction.
I didn't think it was worth bothering about for that interim scenario.
--Tim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-12 6:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <48227ef3.WIWE0hYubr4nS8cD%tes@sgi.com>
2008-05-12 6:41 ` review: log_filter.patch 018,081,082 pv#981362 David Chinner
2008-05-12 6:47 ` Timothy Shimmin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox