From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 13 May 2008 01:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m4D8ZH6r010785 for ; Tue, 13 May 2008 01:35:18 -0700 Received: from ns.unixsol.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id D001D1225EDE for ; Tue, 13 May 2008 01:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.unixsol.org (ns.unixsol.org [193.110.159.2]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id pMryDR90uLVScHpL for ; Tue, 13 May 2008 01:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <482952F2.3080608@unixsol.org> Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:36:02 +0300 From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2) References: <4828CAC6.3090402@unixsol.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List Jan Engelhardt mumbled something about, On 5/13/08 2:21 AM: > On Tuesday 2008-05-13 00:55, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote: >> Not needed here, because no jfs partition is in use. >> Not needed here, because no xfs partition is in use. >> I dont use gfs2 > > You miss the best of Linux. So, why not unload the modules? ext3 is working just fine for now, thanks (: >>> 1141 ? S< 0:00 \_ [block-osm/1] >> What is osm? Can't find anything in kernel config? > > drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c:#define OSM_NAME "block-osm" > >>> 1148 ? S< 0:00 \_ [khpsbpkt] >> What is this? > > ieee1394/ieee1394_core.c:static struct task_struct *khpsbpkt_thread; Strange names :) -- Georgi Chorbadzhiyski http://georgi.unixsol.org/