From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sat, 17 May 2008 09:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com ([192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m4HG36sA001003 for ; Sat, 17 May 2008 09:03:06 -0700 Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 50B5516DF5E6 for ; Sat, 17 May 2008 08:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mx1.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id fWDNGyoJu1exZNQ5 for ; Sat, 17 May 2008 08:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <482EF7D0.2030309@dgreaves.com> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 16:20:48 +0100 From: David Greaves MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Regression- XFS won't mount on partitioned md array References: <482DC043.5000307@dgreaves.com> <482DCCCD.8020503@dgreaves.com> <6101e8c40805161135w7470123uaac93ca59caee026@mail.gmail.com> <482EF026.9000206@dgreaves.com> In-Reply-To: <482EF026.9000206@dgreaves.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Oliver Pinter Cc: Justin Piszcz , David Chinner , LinuxRaid , xfs@oss.sgi.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Eric Sandeen David Greaves wrote: > Oliver Pinter wrote: >> this[1] patch fixed? >> >> 1: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=blob;f=queue-2.6.25/block-do_mounts-accept-root-non-existant-partition.patch;h=097cda9928b434994dbb157065b2ca38e7cec3a1;hb=8cc4c3b370d59deb16c2e92165a466c82e914020 > > > Looks like a possible candidate - thanks. > > I think this patch is for mounting root on an md device when the partitions > aren't yet initialised. > > However: > * When I run cfdisk I can read the partition table. > * Subsequent attempts to mount the xfs when /proc/partitions is clearly present > still fail. > >> this patch is for 2.6.25.5 kernel > ? there isn't a 2.6.25.5 Sorry, I understand; it's queued for 2.6.25.5. > It doesn't apply to 2.6.25.4 > > I'll see if I can make it apply... Yep - it was download corruption. Applied but it didn't help. David