From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 27 May 2008 09:54:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com ([192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m4RGsamo024897 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 09:54:36 -0700 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 199D0169F602 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 09:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id DYQhvueYf6hhHF7Q for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 09:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <483C3CFC.8040201@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 11:55:24 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfs_check References: <20080527162605.GA30344@lst.de> <483C3B5C.3040407@sandeen.net> <20080527165049.GA20666@puku.stupidest.org> In-Reply-To: <20080527165049.GA20666@puku.stupidest.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Chris Wedgwood Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 11:48:28AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> xfs_check checks... $SOMETHING that xfs_repair still does not, I >> think? > > does that imply that that if $SOMETHING is bad it won't be seen then > repaired then? I can't remember what $SOMETHING is but I bet Barry knows :) -Eric