From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 29 May 2008 13:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m4TK1KBe010547 for ; Thu, 29 May 2008 13:01:20 -0700 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 983271CE0BC for ; Thu, 29 May 2008 13:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 0NdrPMmvD2YQvz86 for ; Thu, 29 May 2008 13:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <483F0BC3.2050901@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:02:11 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS: SB validate failed References: <3607657a0805291005k457791cej1c5f867da0f95965@mail.gmail.com> <483EE5BD.8020407@sandeen.net> <3607657a0805291255i59fd006fi9d6836cf528d19a6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3607657a0805291255i59fd006fi9d6836cf528d19a6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Spam Magnet Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Spam Magnet wrote: > So can this be related to the byte ordering or any of the other > issues mentioned in the FAQ regarding xfs under Linux ? > How can I figure out if my disk is using XLV or is a v2 directory ? Byte ordering is only an issue for the log replay; you'd get a message about that if it were the issue. Does file -s /dev/sdb? say that any of those things even look like an xfs filesystem? If so point xfs_db at it like: xfs_db -r -c "sb 0" -c "p" /dev/sdb that'll tell you if it has v1 dirs I think. -Eric