public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hamid <spam.wax@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@stesmi.com>
Cc: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS: SB validate failed
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 03:35:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48425148.1080105@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48409981.1050405@stesmi.com>


> I think you have the terminology a little mixed up.
>
> If you mount a something without supplying -o loop "mount" will assume
> the filesystem resides in a DEVICE.
>
> If you mount a something WHILE supplying -o loop you tell "mount" that
> it should mount it using a loop device. Note device here, it's trickery
> really as what it does is that "mount" will FIRST create a new device
> node "/dev/loop0" for example and then it will mount from that device
> node.
>
Thanks Stefan, Now it makes real sense.

I guess I am back to my original question:
What does 'SB validate failed' indicate and what it really means to my 
case ?

fdisk reports the structure of the Jaz disk as:

$ sudo fdisk -ul jaz7.img

Disk jaz7.img (SGI disk label): 255 heads, 63 sectors, 0 cylinders
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 bytes

----- partitions -----
Pt#    Device  Info     Start       End   Sectors  Id  System
 8: jaz7.img1            3072   2091007   2087936   a  SGI xfs
 9: jaz7.img2               0      3071      3072   0  SGI volhdr
11: jaz7.img3               0   2091007   2091008   6  SGI volume
----- Bootinfo -----
Bootfile: /unix
----- Directory Entries -----
 0: sgilabel   sector    3 size     512

I went ahead and tried to mount Partition 8 from image using the offset 
and loop options of the mount command:

$ sudo mount -t xfs -o loop,offset=$((512*3072)) jaz7-partition.img /mnt
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop1,
       missing codepage or helper program, or other error
       In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
       dmesg | tail  or so

And system log says:

XFS: bad magic number
XFS: SB validate failed

So I am guessing I have one of these 3 cases:
1- Bad partition table, good file system
2- Good partition table, corrupt file system
3- Or both gone south!!!

I checked the man pages of 'vh' on Irix. It seems that the volhdr
partition is 'usually' 2 megabytes but the disk in question has 3072*512 
bytes ?
Can this be a sign of corruption ?

So where would you start looking at if you wanted to fix this problem ?
Partition table or the file system ?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-01  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-29 17:05 XFS: SB validate failed Spam Magnet
2008-05-29 17:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-05-29 19:55   ` Spam Magnet
2008-05-29 20:02     ` Eric Sandeen
2008-05-29 21:00       ` Spam Magnet
2008-05-29 21:06         ` Eric Sandeen
2008-05-29 21:46           ` Spam Magnet
2008-05-29 22:19             ` Eric Sandeen
2008-05-29 22:25             ` Stefan Smietanowski
2008-05-30  5:28             ` Timothy Shimmin
2008-05-30 17:19               ` Spam Magnet
2008-05-30 17:59                 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2008-05-30 23:26                   ` Hamid
2008-05-31  0:19                     ` Stefan Smietanowski
2008-05-31  0:22                       ` Stefan Smietanowski
2008-06-01  7:35                       ` Hamid [this message]
2008-06-01 10:46                         ` Stefan Smietanowski
2008-06-03 17:36                           ` Spam Magnet
2008-06-03 17:56                             ` Spam Magnet
2008-06-03 18:59                               ` Stefan Smietanowski
2008-06-03 19:39                                 ` Spam Magnet
2008-06-03 20:23                                   ` Stefan Smietanowski
2008-06-05 16:16                                     ` Spam Magnet
2008-06-02  2:08                 ` Timothy Shimmin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48425148.1080105@gmail.com \
    --to=spam.wax@gmail.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=stesmi@stesmi.com \
    --cc=tes@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox