From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com ([192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m542cTCB012203 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:38:29 -0700 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 08ED21777FA0 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id mcRUuB5PNLdglfde for ; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4846005B.6090907@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:39:23 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: DMAPI JFS bug fixes References: <483C78E2.4090000@sonic.net> <483C8227.6090408@sgi.com> <4FC34C16-F0FA-49C5-88CC-83EEF616C218@sonic.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Niv Sardi Cc: Gary Lowell , markgw@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com Niv Sardi wrote: > Gary Lowell writes: >> On May 27, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Mark Goodwin wrote: >>> Gary Lowell wrote: >>>> Hi - >>>> The JFS version of DMAPI had a handful of bug fixes that don't seem >>>> to be in the current tree. I couldn't find anything in the list >>>> archive about them. Would there be any interest in applying those >>>> fixes or is DMAPI pretty much dead ? >>> no it's not dead :) >>> >>>> If there is interest, I've got a patch. >>> yes please post it here, with due reference to the original author(s). >>> >>> Thanks >> Great. I'll double check that they still work with TOT and post them. > > And i thought JFS was dead =) > > any patch would do, I've been looking around and couldn't really find a > repository of the JFS/DMAPI changes. did you find anything like that ? didja google for "jfs dmapi? ;) http://jfs.sourceforge.net/project/pub/dmapi/ sorting out fixes from that looks like fun though. -Eric