From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: is the flush-on-close-after-truncate still needed?
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:09:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4859415B.3000009@sandeen.net> (raw)
After Lachlan's fix to separate on-disk and in-memory sizes, and only
update on-disk when data is on-disk
(http://www.linux.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00020.html) is the
XFS_ITRUNCATED flag / flush-on-close-after-truncate still needed?
Thanks,
-Eric
next reply other threads:[~2008-06-18 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-18 17:09 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2008-06-18 17:49 ` is the flush-on-close-after-truncate still needed? Dave Chinner
2008-06-18 17:59 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-26 21:09 ` DS
2008-06-26 21:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-26 21:24 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-27 7:13 ` DS
2008-06-27 7:28 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4859415B.3000009@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox