From: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] check for invalid flags in xfs_attrlist_by_handle
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:41:51 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <485B431F.2070905@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080531075829.GA5424@lst.de>
Fair enough.
Actually, I think we only use ATTR_ROOT and ATTR_SECURE for the
namespace flags.
So you could probably use: XFS_ATTR_NSP_ARGS
xfs_attr_leaf.h:#define XFS_ATTR_NSP_ARGS_MASK (ATTR_ROOT | ATTR_SECURE)
xfs_attr_leaf.h:#define XFS_ATTR_NSP_ARGS(flags) ((flags) & XFS_ATTR_NSP_ARGS_MASK)
and something like:
if (!XFS_ATTR_NSP_ARGS(al_hreq.flags))
return -XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
Though would probably then need to include the right header (xfs_attr_leaf.h) for it...
--Tim
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> xfs_attrlist_by_handle should only take the ATTR_ flags for the root
> namespaces. The ATTR_KERN* flags may change at anytime and expect special
> preconditions that can't be guaranteed for userspace-originating
> requests. For example passing down ATTR_KERNNOVAL through
> xfs_attrlist_by_handle will hit an assert in debug builds currently.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl.c 2008-05-28 17:37:02.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl.c 2008-05-28 17:42:18.000000000 +0200
> @@ -470,6 +470,12 @@ xfs_attrlist_by_handle(
> if (al_hreq.buflen > XATTR_LIST_MAX)
> return -XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
>
> + /*
> + * Reject flags, only allow namespaces.
> + */
> + if (al_hreq.flags & ~(ATTR_ROOT|ATTR_TRUST|ATTR_SECURE))
> + return -XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
> +
> error = xfs_vget_fsop_handlereq(mp, parinode, &al_hreq.hreq, &inode);
> if (error)
> goto out;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-20 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-31 7:58 [PATCH] check for invalid flags in xfs_attrlist_by_handle Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-20 5:41 ` Timothy Shimmin [this message]
2008-06-20 5:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-23 11:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-24 2:47 ` Timothy Shimmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=485B431F.2070905@sgi.com \
--to=tes@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox