From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m5SK7afJ014343 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:07:37 -0700 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id C3F5C1237BDF for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:08:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id iROmFbJ3qzLezsdF for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:08:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48669A45.1050104@sandeen.net> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:08:37 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] re-remove xfs custom bitops References: <480EB397.1040304@sandeen.net> <4829C360.5060500@sandeen.net> <482BF841.8050704@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <482BF841.8050704@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Donald Douwsma Cc: xfs-oss Donald Douwsma wrote: > Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> Once more, with feeling! >>> >>> This re-instates the reverted mod after the ppc panic of >>> Feb '08. You guys do have ppc boxes in the test farm now right? :) >>> >>> This keeps xfs_lowbit64 as it was since there aren't good >>> generic helpers there ... >>> >>> This should probably keep Dave's signed-off line, there's >>> a bit of my (userspace) testing here but no original work. >>> >>> This exact patch isn't tested but it's based on a conglomeration >>> of prior testing... >> SGI guys, any takers on this one? >> -Eric > > Sorry Eric, havent had chance to run this on all platforms yet. > I want to test it on ppc as well as the usual x86_64/ia64 combinations, > then I'll get it committed. > > Don Don, how's that all going then? :) Thanks, -Eric