From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m6C0YMkK001008
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:34:23 -0700
Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 47FB92E048D
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id KIhUIK8iomlbfLbx for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4877FC4F.7020906@sandeen.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:35:27 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: xfs leaking?
References: <4877928A.1020008@sandeen.net> <20080711233832.GH11558@disturbed>
In-Reply-To: <20080711233832.GH11558@disturbed>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

Dave Chinner wrote:

> I'd suggest updating to 2.6.26-rc9 and repeating the test.  After
> unmounting all the filesystems and before you rmmod the kernel
> module, dump /proc/slabinfo so we can see if there are remaining
> objects in the XFs slabs....

Yep I fired up on 2.6.26-rc9 this morning after I sent the mail.  And I
wish I'd checked the slabs before the explosion last time ... it'll be
full again in a while and I'll try again.

The complete lack of memory may well explain the horrendous repair
performance, too.  :)

-Eric

> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.