From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:06:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id m6E46U2j014893 for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:06:31 -0700 Message-ID: <487AD102.9020306@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:07:30 +1000 From: Mark Goodwin Reply-To: markgw@sgi.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfs leaking? References: <4877928A.1020008@sandeen.net> <20080711233832.GH11558@disturbed> <4877FC4F.7020906@sandeen.net> <487810BE.5050701@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <487810BE.5050701@sandeen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss Eric Sandeen wrote: > > 2.6.26-rc9 passed without incident. So what is the conclusion here? Because you just down-rev? Or do we have an intermittent leak of some kind? Cheers -- Mark Goodwin markgw@sgi.com Engineering Manager for XFS and PCP Phone: +61-3-99631937 SGI Australian Software Group Cell: +61-4-18969583 -------------------------------------------------------------