From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m6LGAEYC014722 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:10:14 -0700 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A8B79E74400 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id y6dk3nrqGtKO2n2p for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4884B527.1030104@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:11:19 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock References: <4880AEF8.2080906@cape-horn-eng.com> <48815AA6.3080102@sgi.com> <488457F3.2050405@cape-horn-eng.com> In-Reply-To: <488457F3.2050405@cape-horn-eng.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Richard Ems Cc: markgw@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Bill O'Donnell Richard Ems wrote: > Mark Goodwin wrote: >> Hi Richard, >> >> this looks like XFS b-tree corruption of some sort. We have some patches >> that should help here. The patches are being back-ported to SLES10 and >> should also apply to OpenSUSE. We should have something ready early next >> week. > > Thanks Mark. The most annoying thing is that, after many repairs, it's > working again! But my big question is ... for how long? How stable is > the filesystem now? Should I better recreate it? WHY did this happen? > Why did the FS fail again after some repairs? 8( > > Where can I get more info about these patches? Is there a developer > mailing list? Or some webpage to follow the development progress? This *is* the developer mailing list, and I am honestly a bit frustrated that said bugs & patches are not being aired & reviewed in public, honestly. -Eric