From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m6MAmBVH024385 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:48:12 -0700 Message-ID: <4885BB2E.3010508@cape-horn-eng.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:49:18 +0200 From: Richard Ems MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock References: <4880AEF8.2080906@cape-horn-eng.com> <48815AA6.3080102@sgi.com> <4884B419.6080603@thebarn.com> <488552EC.8060803@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <488552EC.8060803@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: markgw@sgi.com Cc: Russell Cattelan , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Bill O'Donnell Mark Goodwin wrote: > Some of the above might not refer directly to the final committed > patches but the thread URLs should be accurate. These are bug fixes > that go a long way back and really do need to be back-ported and > pushed out for the mentioned distros. There are probably other patches > not listed above that should be considered too. Hi Mark, thanks for the list and clarifications. But still some more questions ... who does the backporting for the distros? SGI or the distros themselves? Is someone from Novell / SUSE / openSUSE reading here? When can we *expect* to have these patches backported? In one month? Three months? More? Thanks, Richard -- Richard Ems mail: Richard.Ems@Cape-Horn-Eng.com Cape Horn Engineering S.L. C/ Dr. J.J. Dómine 1, 5º piso 46011 Valencia Tel : +34 96 3242923 / Fax 924