From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com ([192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m6MFLiD0018529 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:21:45 -0700 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0F5C419194AB for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id AT6Gn94fApcv6O20 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4885FB40.5000807@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:22:40 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock References: <4880AEF8.2080906@cape-horn-eng.com> <48815AA6.3080102@sgi.com> <4884B419.6080603@thebarn.com> <488552EC.8060803@sgi.com> <4885BB2E.3010508@cape-horn-eng.com> <4885C425.9020309@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <4885C425.9020309@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: markgw@sgi.com Cc: Richard Ems , Russell Cattelan , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Bill O'Donnell Mark Goodwin wrote: > > Richard Ems wrote: >> When can we *expect* to have these patches backported? In one month? >> Three months? More? > > For SLES, within a week. For OpenSuSE presumeably the SLES folks will > follow-up with OpenSuSE, but I can't predict when. For Fedora, Eric > Sandeen. For RHEL (on anything except SGI storage platforms), nobody > since XFS is not supported directly by Redhat. Nor even shipped with RHEL. But hopefully the CentOS guys will pick it up, I'll give them a heads up when the list of fixes appears. Thanks, -Eric