From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
Niv Sardi-Altivanik <xaiki@sgi.com>,
sgi.bugs.xfs@engr.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: TAKE 981498 - remove mounpoint UUID code
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:01:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4889EAC9.5070304@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080725050149.GL5947@disturbed>
Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:45:42PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Niv Sardi-Altivanik wrote:
>>> remove mounpoint UUID code
>> Are you sure this didn't change any disk structures? The patch I sent
>> was RFC and completely untested... (and disclosed as such...) :)
>
> Looking at the original patch, it definitely does change the format
> of log structures on disk. it removes the union of the uuid and rdev
> in the xfs_inode_log_format[32|64] which takes that entry from 16
> bytes down to 4 bytes. So I'd suggest that thisss should be removed
> immediately before it hits public and people start corrupting their
> filesystems....
Yep. Well crud, I even knew that when I sent it, hence the
RFC/untested/blah/blah but I suppose I shouldn't send a patch that I
know to be busted even if it's just as a whaddya-think. I'll pad out
the union, check all the log structs, run qa & resend.
And despite all the talk about community & contributors running qa and
helping with test coverage - as a general rule do sgi devels run qa too
before committing?
-Eric
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-25 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-25 3:38 TAKE 981498 - remove mounpoint UUID code Niv Sardi-Altivanik
2008-07-25 3:45 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-07-25 5:01 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-25 15:01 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2008-07-28 1:06 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2008-07-28 1:56 ` Timothy Shimmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4889EAC9.5070304@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=sgi.bugs.xfs@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=xaiki@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox