From: Christian Affolter <c.affolter@stepping-stone.ch>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected - on heavy hard linking
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:47:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <489732B2.7000201@stepping-stone.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080725052051.GA26367@infradead.org>
Hi
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 07:40:19PM +0200, Christian Affolter wrote:
>> Kernel-Error:
>> Filesystem "sdc1": XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1163 of
>> file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller 0xffffffff803a4fcf
>> Pid: 22816, comm: cp Not tainted 2.6.24-gentoo-r8 #1
>
> 2.6.24 is pretty old. Did you try with a recent kernel? We had some
> fixes for in-core memory corruption although I don't remember one in
> this area.
I finally found the time to update the kernel to a recent 2.6.26 version.
Unfortunately the problem still exists:
Filesystem "dm-3": XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1163 of
file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller 0xffffffff803a6672
Pid: 12584, comm: cp Not tainted 2.6.26-gentoo #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff803a6672>] xfs_create+0x1c2/0x4c0
[<ffffffff8039fd16>] xfs_trans_cancel+0x126/0x150
[<ffffffff803a6672>] xfs_create+0x1c2/0x4c0
[<ffffffff803b186d>] xfs_vn_mknod+0x16d/0x2c0
[<ffffffff80291b7c>] vfs_create+0xcc/0x130
[<ffffffff8029539f>] do_filp_open+0x77f/0x860
[<ffffffff80286d1a>] do_sys_open+0x5a/0xf0
[<ffffffff8020b49b>] system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80
xfs_force_shutdown(dm-3,0x8) called from line 1164 of file
fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Return address = 0xffffffff8039fd2f
Filesystem "dm-3": Corruption of in-memory data detected. Shutting down
filesystem: dm-3
Please umount the filesystem, and rectify the problem(s)
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
xfs_force_shutdown(dm-3,0x1) called from line 420 of file
fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c. Return address = 0xffffffff803a9529
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
xfs_force_shutdown(dm-3,0x1) called from line 420 of file
fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c. Return address = 0xffffffff803a9529
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Filesystem "dm-3": xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Before the shutdown happens the copy command receives a
"No space left on device" error:
cp: cannot create regular file `[file name snipped': No space left on device
cp: cannot create regular file `[file name snipped]': Input/output error
Although the device has more than 50% free space as well as free inodes.
The affected device was initialized with old xfsprogs (2.8.11):
meta-data=/dev/evms/vol1 isize=256 agcount=3207, agsize=4096 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=13132799, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=1024, version=1
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
realtime =none extsz=65536 blocks=0, rtextents=0
Creating a new device with xfsprogs (2.9.7) leads to the following layout:
meta-data=/dev/sdc1 isize=256 agcount=5, agsize=3662818 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2
data = bsize=4096 blocks=17750000, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=7153, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
On the newly created device, the problem is much harder to reproduce,
however it happens nonetheless after around a day of heavy copying and
deleting.
Any further hints?
Many thanks
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-04 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-23 17:40 Corruption of in-memory data detected - on heavy hard linking Christian Affolter
2008-07-25 5:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-04 16:47 ` Christian Affolter [this message]
2008-08-05 0:19 ` Dave Chinner
[not found] ` <48A02FF6.70703@stepping-stone.ch>
2008-08-11 23:52 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=489732B2.7000201@stepping-stone.ch \
--to=c.affolter@stepping-stone.ch \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox